Flush the ‘Gurus’: Why You Shouldn’t Follow Everyone Who Follows You on Twitter

by JD Rucker on Jan 27, 2011
Toilet_Handle

The debate has raged since Twitter hit a tipping point in 2008. “Should you follow everyone who follows your Twitter account?”

Share this post

No.

Many of the “gurus” say otherwise. We won’t name them here, as most have extremely valid points on other issues and to tarnish them over this one point would be a disservice. It’s easy to fall into the alwaysfollowback trap, after all, and on the surface the reasons seem valid. Dig deeper and the truth becomes clear – Twitter can add more value to your business (and you can add more value to Twitter) if you are selective with the accounts you follow.

Twitter-etiquette be damned. Here’s why:

Spammers and Bots and Teeth Whiteners, Oh My!

This is the easy one and no guru will debate it. Don’t follow spammers. Keep in mind, they’re getting smarter. Spotting them isn’t as easy as it once was, so look at their feed and if it smells like spam, fry it.

Don’t confuse feeds with spam. There are times when you will want to follow particular accounts that are not actively controlled by humans but that offer value. They could be industry-feeds within your niche, news feeds of sites that you trust, or even competitor’s auto-feeds. Twitter has become the fastest venue for breaking news (and faux-news) and can be used as such.

Just because they aren’t human doesn’t mean they’re spammers. Follow the feeds that you like.

Twitter is for Conversations

Those companies who are good at Twitter develop a following and broadcast their messages to their audience. Those companies who are great at Twitter develop conversations, actively interact with their customers and potential customers, and keep track of what is happening in and out of their industry.

Sometimes, the conversation is directed towards you. These are the no-brainers – reply! Being able to initiate conversations is not below a business account. In fact, talking to customers and starting conversations is a distinct separator between those who are great at Twitter and those who are Twitter-Masters.

What does this have to do with following people? The noise-factor is one that is often brought up by those who are against following everyone, and to some extent it is real. The challenge with the argument is that once you reach a certain size, there’s no way to avoid the noise. Let’s assume that you are building an account that is following thousands. Guess what – you have noise in your stream.

Following those who are actively conversing with others rather than simply broadcasting (other than the feed-exceptions listed above) will dramatically help to filter the low-quality accounts. Looking for users with which to initiate conversation is always easiest when the choices are limited. The “noise” that people talk about often refers to the casual mentions of grilled-cheese sandwiches and pickles. Do you care about grilled-cheese sandwiches?

It doesn’t matter. The quality of the user is more important than the noise level. If someone tweets about pickles five times then responds to someone who asks about their favorite color, they are probably a good person to follow. Why? Because they respond. Conversations only happen when two users are both willing to talk to each other. If only one is talking and the other isn’t responding, it’s a personalized monologue.

Noise is unavoidable. Quality is everything. Conversation is the key.

Perceptions and the Rise of Klout

There are certain unavoidable truths that grow more unavoidable and more true as Twitter matures. One of those truths is that if you follow as many people or more than are following you, the perception that people have towards you when they visit your account will be lower than if you are following fewer. It’s that simple.

More importantly for the future, Klout is gaining traction every day. Over 1000 services are using their API and there is speculation that big players such as Google are looking to them for help with the social factor in their search algorithm. Some are calling it SocialRank, a reference to the PageRank system that Google uses to rate a website’s link authority. In other words, the better your Klout Score, the more likely it is that your Tweets and the links within them will rank higher in search as a result.

The solution to this and all of the concerns above is to not follow everyone. It sounds easy enough, but there are challenges. Here is how some of those challenges can be met:

Conversation vs Broadcasting

Twitter can be a tremendous marketing and customer relationship tool, but it can also be a time-drain if not done right. The general rule is this: use the right automation tools to broadcast your messages, blog posts, videos, etc., and spend your “live time” on Twitter replying to people and sparking conversations. What you don’t want to happen is that you get caught posting everything manually.

Scheduling tweets properly allows you to engage when appropriate and not get bogged down broadcasting. For example, let’s say you have 15 minutes set aside a day to engage on Twitter. Scheduled tweets would run at a separate time. The “live time” will not be broken up by your broadcast messages and you’ll be free to “keep it real” during these times.

Keeping Up with Following


(Source)

There are two methods, here. If you are gaining a manageable number of followers per day, simply go through each account that follows you and pick out the ones to follow (described below). Again, there are tools that allow you to vet your followers and keep track of the ones you’ve already seen so you aren’t looking at the same accounts over and over again.

If your following gets too hard to manually add, work it from the other direction. Follow everyone, then unfollow those who are lower-quality. Twitter is constantly changing what they allow and don’t allow in the way of how tools interact with your followers, but as quickly as they change, the various services find ways to continue to make it easy for users. Tools that minimize the time spent vetting are necessary, particularly for fast-growing accounts.

Identifying Accounts To Follow

When you go through accounts, there are certain signs you can see at a glance:

  • @replies – If they aren’t talking to anyone else, they won’t talk to you either.
  • Repetitive Tweets – They say it. Then they say it again. And again. Run.
  • Trolling – Sometimes, Trolls aren’t a bad thing. Most of the time, they are. If they spend their day insulting people and companies, there’s not need to get involved.
  • Retweets – You can see a retweeter from a mile away. Look for @replies that follow “RT” or “Via”. Retweeters, particularly those who like to retweet quality content, are gold. Follow then and engage often.

It takes practice, but you’ll get to the point that you can identify the quality of a Twitter user based upon these signs in 2 or 3 seconds. Literally. Once you’re there, you’ll be able to build a powerful account that will be following the right people and that can gain followers faster as a result.

  • http://twitter.com/MarcelloENT Dave

    Couldn’t agree more. Here’s my simplified approach in a recent blog post entitled “No Follow Backsies” http://marcelloentertainment.com/blog/text/12629714

  • http://www.davesaunders.net/blog Dave Saunders

    Great resource for anyone trying to navigate the “who to follow” conundrum of the day. I think it’s worth noting that autofollow was a more viable strategy 2-3 years ago and some “gurus” have changed their tune on this. One comes to mind who even deleted his entire follow list and now follows no one…but does use a lot of lists. If people think their strategy out and seek guidance of thought, rather than the latest formula, they’re going to fare better in a constantly evolving system.

  • http://twitter.com/charlotteclark charlotteclark

    I definitely think that you shouldn’t auto-follow back. In my first social media position we tried it and just found that a lot of people changed their mind about us and stopped following us, making our numbers look a little iffy. If you want to work with social proof then you need to get visitors for the right reasons, and have a higher number of followers to the number of people you’re following. As usual, great post!

  • Anonymous

    OH wow, OK this really does make a lot of sense dude, Wow.

    http://www.privacy-tools.au.tc

  • http://www.himublog.com/ himu

    i have tiny number of followers. so i have to follow them all. how can i increase my followers

  • http://twitter.com/janetcallaway Janet Callaway

    Good thoughts/comments. Found what you had to say on Google & Klout particuarly interesting.

    What’s your thought on using automation to follow? Read an interesting post recently on using automation, following 3 days and unfollowing the lesser quality/non-niche on 1 day.

  • http://ethanbloch.com ethan

    Use Twitter search to find people talking about your business and/or you space (i.e. related keywords) and follow those people. If you have something good to say and you add value, some will follow you back. Rinse and repeat.

  • http://ethanbloch.com ethan

    I would avoid unfollowing people who don’t follow you at all cost. If you do this in a automated fashion it’s called following churn and Twitter might algorithmically suspend or ban your Twitter account.

    That being said, if you are using an automated tool that finds relevant, keyword here is relevant i.e. people who might actually find valuable what it is you have to say. I don’t see anything wrong with that, especially when you’re first starting out.

    Once Twitter launches the ability to promote your account to relevant followers this will also be highly effective.

  • Anonymous

    I love this. I love it even more because it saves me having to write it.

    Nicely done.

  • http://twitter.com/thinkwantget Pani Voskou

    Quality article. Thanks.

  • http://twitter.com/VaultNews Caprica Hero

    Awesome article! Well written and informative. Thank you for sharing Klout. :)

  • http://blogarticlesite.com Natalie – Blogarticle

    I don’t think I have come across anyone that is a troll on twitter. I have stopped following people who tweet every two minutes though, and each tweet is a page from their website. I follow people because I want to know what they are reading. i know their site already and just want to be notified of new posts, apart from that, show me what is good on the World Wide web.

  • http://www.capitolbizsupport.com Shelley

    This is an issue I ran in to with a few of my clients. They felt it was “proper twitter etiquette” to automatically follow anybody who follows them. They were always worried when someone stopped following them because they didn’t immediately follow them back. I’ve since shown them that quality matters much more than quantity when it comes to twitter followers. And I’ll also be sharing this post with them. Thanks for the great info!

  • http://twitter.com/silvia_az Silvia Azevedo

    This post is fantastic. Simple and direct. Perfect!

  • http://twitter.com/MadDelphi Richard Eradus

    twitilla.com is a twitter management tool that uses klout. Pretty cool app that shows you your klout, drop ratio and if your klout score has changed.

  • http://www.techiemania.com Sathish

    Interesting tips. I am just starting with twitter and I thought following all the people who follows me would be the best way to build a powerful profile. But this post tells the exact opposite. Well, now I am going to change my plans and I will start focusing on the quality of the user. Anyway, thanks for the article.

  • http://www.masterpapers.com/ custom research paper

    Very interesting information! Thank you!

  • Anonymous

    Great article, with some great tips for those just getting started on Twitter. I’m not a big fan of the auto-follow, but I know that a lot of people use it to get started. I advise quality over quantity when clients ask me about the “followback” debate…’

    Thanks for sharing!

  • http://www.zmags.com/blog Joakim Ditlev

    Spot on! Half the followers you get these days are either robots or spam-profiles. I don’t bother following back – I will do so eventually if I find a reason for it.

  • http://www.momcomm.com/2011/05/has-your-twitter-automation-gone-rogue/ Automating Twitter | — Momcomm

    [...] If you want to read an entire post about why you shouldn’t follow everyone back, you should read this one from a site I just discovered but already love called [...]

  • http://www.BeyondTransition.com Denis Oakley

    I follow back triathletes as they are my business. If they’re not I don’t unless there is a clear reason to do so. I may follow triathlon or swim bike run businesses if it appears that they can add value 

  • http://www.choosinglove.net Wendy

    Love the toilet picture! I only follow less than 100 as I cannot keep up otherwise.  I have no idea how people who follow 20,000+ can possibly see what is going on. Glad to know RT is a good thing! I’m still a relative newbie on Twitter and you helped me to use the social media in a better fashion. Thank you!

  • http://twitter.com/DebbieBBurns Debbie Baker Burns

    Trying to make my mind up regarding this issue and you’ve made some good points!

blog comments powered by Disqus
Get Email Updates (It's Free)
One email a month, with unsubscribe, & no spam. Ever.