Size Doesn’t Matter: Why Super Accounts Can Be Worthless

by JD Rucker on Jan 6, 2011
Size_Matters

There are those who believe that social media is simply a numbers game. They will preach about getting thousands of fans and followers and hundreds of retweets and likes in an effort to get the most out of social media. They define engagement in ways that can be quantified – bigger is better from their perspective and bulk is king.

Share this post

In many ways, they just don’t understand social media.

Size doesn’t matter. Presence is everything. While there can be an indirect correlation between the two, one thing is certain: there are small accounts with tremendous influence and huge accounts with none. Here’s why…

The Value of a Twitter Follower

Does anyone really believe that there are over 200 million people using Twitter? Despite the growth rate, in reality there are likely only around 14 million daily active users and 40 million monthly active users. What are the other accounts doing?

Many are just sitting there. People create an account, check out Twitter, and for one reason or another never return. They still have an account and will continue to have that account indefinitely.

In other cases, individuals or companies have multiple accounts. Sometimes, social media firms will have dozens, hundreds, or even thousands of accounts tweeting out their messages. These accounts are not listening to anything. They are creating one-way sounding boards and hoping that through sheer bulk people will listen and click through to their links.

As a result, it’s very easy to build up accounts with thousands, tens of thousands, or even hundreds of thousands of “followers.” Twitter has cracked down more and more over the lasts couple of years on tactics such as mass following/unfollowing (known as churn), mass account creation, account validation, and tools to assist with followers. For ever measure they take, a dozen countermeasures are created to combat it. Spammers will be spammers.

If you send a tweet and only bots are getting the message, did you really tweet at all?

Not all followers are created equal. It’s better to have 100 engaged and active followers than 10,000 inactive accounts and bots.

The Value of a Facebook Like

On Facebook, it’s the same story with a different situation. Facebook is better than Twitter at keeping spam accounts at bay, but when you’re dealing with 600 million, some slide through. Millions, in fact.

How many Lindsay Lohan’s are there in the world that look like the rehabbing actress? Apparently, hundreds. What do these accounts do? They like things. They like pages. They like stories. They like affiliate links and malware sites.

For as little as 5 cents paid by a social media firm tasked with getting more “Likes” (formerly known as fans) to your Facebook page, they will like you as well.

Bulk is even less relevant on Facebook than it is on Twitter. A page with 100,000 artificial likes can actually have less power and receive fewer views than an active and engaging page with 1000 real likes. The Facebook promotional algorithm bases as much on quality as quantity, so if you have a message posted to your page and the right people like it, you can get tens of thousands of views. Dozens of the wrong “people” liking or commenting on your story is not only worthless but can actually hurt your ability to expose your message.

An entire article can be written about this dynamic and it’s becoming more complex as Facebook grows and learns.

Be Selective and Fight the Urge

The image above is not intended to toot our own horn or highlight the follies of others. It’s to prove a point. While Klout is not always completely accurate, it is a strong indicator of how influential an account has become.

Despite having a larger account, the socialpros are not very effective at getting out their message. They have a decent reach, but nobody they’re talking to is listening and few (if any) are retweeting/liking their messages. As a result, their bigger account is relatively worthless compared to ours.

Conversation. Engagement. Quality. These are all things that matter in social media. It isn’t that a growth strategy doesn’t work – it should definitely be part of your overall social media presence. Getting big and creating a “super account” with hundreds of thousands of worthless followers is, well, worthless.

It’s tempting. There are those that promise 50 thousand Twitter followers or Facebook likes for hundreds of dollars. While there are definitely growth services who are effective, the vast majority are only able to bulk up numbers. In many cases, these bulked numbers can do more harm than good.

Automation is another key aspect in a proper strategy. There’s a difference between using tools to effectively get your message out to the right people at the right time and automation schemes that allow you to “set it and forget it.” Those simply do not work. Facebook and Twitter are smart. Their users are even smarter. They can sniff out an RSS-fed account very easily.

Through engagement, you will be able to grow your accounts naturally. A quality account is worth ten times, even hundreds of times more than a bot or bulk account. Learn the techniques to grow your accounts effectively and avoid the bulking-up techniques or services that do not bring quality. As a general rule, if it sounds too good to be true… you get the picture.

  • John Gurnick

    Good food for thought here. I like your comment, “Size doesn’t matter. Presence is everything.” I think it should read, “Size doesn’t matter. Presence is and frequency of use is everything.” When you have users that depend on your application and use it so often it becomes a part of your daily routine you have a captive audience and that is what is important.

    John Gurnick

  • http://twitter.com/charlotteclark charlotteclark

    Love your comment about bots. Definitely agree that numbers don’t necessarily tell the true story, although I’m not sure of the weight that Klout carries. It seems to vary every time I look at it.

    Love the blog though guys, got it bookmarked. Keep up the good work! :)

  • http://twitter.com/Kajagugu Kajagugu

    True. Very true. Especially the twitter user count. This is one of about 10 accounts I have because I need a different audience for each one. I can’t say everything I want to all my followers, so I need to segregate them. That’s the issue with “social networks” #amirite?

  • http://ethanbloch.com ethan

    Thanks Charlotte!

  • Frankie

    Glad that you are on the track of engaging and keeping customers which is where you all started, right?

  • http://freshome.com Mihai

    What is the best way to find the people who have the best engagement ? Except Klout …that is very vague.

  • Isra Garcia

    Love this post, it’s all about human interactions, thanks for remind us. Keep rocking buddies!

  • http://www.techiemania.com Sathish

    Wonderful article which explains the human interactions. I know numbers doesn’t matter at all but sometimes without interaction something happens if we have a huge follower base in Twitter.

  • Anonymous

    Interaction and devotion is important, but you can’t get some interaction and activity going without numbers. So I disagree Sathish. I’ll tell you why this article has a lot of good points, but its conclusion is mostly wrong and completely ignores the human psychological factors.

    When somebody sees that a Facebook page has 5 fans or a Twitter account has maybe 12 followers, they are much less to follow your product or start engaging with you. The low number is a psychological signal that page isn’t valued by too many people.

    Unless you have a lot of money to continuously advertise over a long period of time or great media contacts, it takes a lot of time and effort to get some real social media traction. That’s why services such as http://facebook.getmorepopular.com that send out thousands of invites and delivers quantity and quality can be really valuable. If you can get a lot of fans on your page quickly, you can grow and get real interactions going A LOT quicker than otherwise possible.

  • http://www.flowtown.com/blog/how-to-use-social-media-to-bum-out-your-customers-in-2011 How To Use Social Media To Bum Out Your Customers In 2011 / Flowtown (@flowtown)

    [...] already established in the past that social media super-accounts are often worthless. Even worse is having a mouse account. You know, those accounts that make a lot [...]

  • http://www.syncers.com/ Karan Lugani

    Purely shows that its the interaction that matters. Getting a great fan base with automated followers or price is not beneficial at all.

blog comments powered by Disqus
Get Email Updates (It's Free)
One email a month, with unsubscribe, & no spam. Ever.